INTRODUCTION

Welcome to The New Archaeology Review. This is the premier archaeology blog offering fresh perspectives and voices on the archaeology beat, challenging accepted ideas with new theories on our ancient past. It focuses on controversial issues and offers an open forum for free debate and inquiry. We feature top experts and cover news that is well researched and documented.

There is new archaeological evidence that is changing the way we view human society and our role in the world. They have challenged conventional wisdom and showed us a past waiting for discovery. This has resulted in a "new" archaeology which is multicultural and multidisciplinary. These new archaeologists have sought to unravel misconception and tap ancient knowledge with a passion and voracity unequaled since Heinrich Schliemann and the earliest years of investigative archaeology. The New Archaeology Review encompasses this world-view. We encourage you to write for us, and email Pat Chouinard with your comments to thearchaeologyshow@live.com. They will be read on the air, and responded to our guests if possible.

Search This Blog

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Archaeological Evidence for First-century Synagogues in Ancient Judaea


Dr. James F. Strange PhD



In Israel there are ancient structures at Gamala, Capernaum (beneath the white limestone synagogue), Qiryat Sefer, Masada, Jericho, Modi'in, and Herodium. The archaeologists who unearthed these buildings have identified them as synagogues of the first century CE. These halls resemble later synagogues recognized as such from their Jewish art and from dedicatory inscriptions in Greek or Aramaic that actually identify the buildings as "synagogues."
But are the first century examples actually synagogues? After all, they do not seem to contain Jewish art, nor do they have inscriptions identifying them as such.
There are at least five reasons to identify these seven possible synagogues as the real thing:

1. These buildings organize innermost space in a similar manner, namely, it is rectangular and surrounded on three or four sides by rows of columns, then by ranges of benches on two, three, or four sides.

2. One must use the benches as steps to move from the top bench or landing to the floor. This calls to mind a saying of Jesus in Mark 12:39 and parallels that excoriates the Scribes for preferring the "first seats" in synagogues, presumably on the top rank.

3. Worshipers sitting or standing on the benches must look through a balustrade of columns to see what is going on centrally. This is echoed in the construction of the Diaspora synagogues at Priene in Greece and at Ostia in Italy.

4. The “Jewishness” of these structures is not given by art or inscriptions, but by their presence in a Jewish town or village, or even in a Jewish fortress.

5. Although parts of these buildings resemble structures in the Roman Empire, their total organization is novel. The closest analog is the ancient basilica, but the basilicas we know are far larger than most of these buildings. These buildings resemble one another more than anything else. The commonality between them also suggests strongly that their builders were seeing some structure or structures that gave them the extraordinary idea of arranging seating between the columns and the walls. I believe that "something else" to be the stoa on the temple Mount in Jerusalem.
That is, the space from wall to columns is in effect a porch or stoa. Two porches running parallel with a roof on top is a basilica, as is usually reconstructed on the south side of the Temple court in Jerusalem, following Josephus. The first century synagogues that we have found tend to model themselves after Israel's holiest shrine.These structures surely represent those mentioned by Josephus and by the New Testament authors and situated in the Holy Land in the first century CE

No comments:

Post a Comment